Tuesday, March 11, 2025

Truest statement of the week

Minority students — and especially low-income minority students — already face barriers to higher education. Explicitly enforcing those barriers to equal opportunity is an unforgivable step backwards.

This was never about combatting discrimination. The administration is intentionally removing pathways for marginalized students to attend school and do research — preying on minority students and targeting the programs that make our most vulnerable classmates feel at home at Harvard.

In the uncertainty following the initial Dear Colleague letter, students and clubs faced murky waters seemingly governed by vague, fickle orders from the White House. Such confusion does indisputable harm to education and student life — in a forest of threats and ultimatums, progressives tread carefully, which is exactly what our aggressors want.

-- "The Ed Department Is Coming For Diversity," HARVARD CRIMSON editorial board. 



A note to our readers

 Hey --

Monday.



Let's thank all who participated this edition which includes Dallas and the following:


The Third Estate Sunday Review's Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess and Ava,
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude,
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man,
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review,
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills),
Mike of Mikey Likes It!,
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz),
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix,
Ruth of Ruth's Report,
Wally of The Daily Jot,
Trina of Trina's Kitchen, 
Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ,
Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends,
Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts,
and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub.

 

And what did we come up with?


We didn't get much done this weekend and were going to just do Ava and C.I.s media piece this week.  But, as we scrambled, we thought of somethings to include.  Ava and C.I. were the ones who picked this.

Ava and C.I. cover a sitcom (HAPPY'S PLACE) and a train wreck (Donald Chump).
Isaiah discusses a book he reviewed with Ava and C.I.
Books reviewed so far this year at community sites.
Repost of Marcia's post.
Some of this year's deaths we felt needed noting. 
Senator Elizabeth Warren. 
It's amazing how they raged against Kamala Harris supporters and told them to go to hell but now the freaks expect Harris voters to help them.  
Know the enemy and hold the enemy accountable. 

Ha ha.
MTN.
We actually did not intend to note this twice.  But it's good enough that we'll consider our mistake the universe telling us to note it more than once.

This is what we listened to while writing tis edition.

Peace.

 

-- Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava and C.I.











Media: Some returns work better than others

HAPPY'S PLACE?  

Is there such a thing in the US these days?


tc2


On TV, there is.  NBC on Fridays has been where to find it, Reba McEntire's third attempt at a sitcom. First up was REBA which lasted six seasons and 127 episodes and still plays daily on CMT and other channels.  Next came MALIBU BEACH which only lasted one season and 18 episodes.  Now HAPPY'S PLACE and, with a second season renewal, it's already doing better than her second sitcom.

Reba and her character Bobbie were strong and steady from the start of this series but other elements took a bit and, around episode three, the show found its stride.  Teaming up Reba and Melissa Peterman again was a smart move.  Peterman played Barbara Jean on REBA and was a source of angst and tension on that show.  They've got a Christine and Barb chemistry (THE NEW ADVENTURES OF OLD CHRISTINE) and that's not easy to create.  Joining them is Belissa Escobedo as Bobbie's half-sister Isabella, Reba's real life husband Rex Linn (the two previously worked together on the TV series BIG SKY), Pablo Castelblanco as accountant Steve and Tokala Black Elk as Takoda who works at the bar.

The bar was left to Bobbie and Isabella by their late father and it's HAPPY'S PLACE.

Maybe, in The Age of Chump, the only place Americans can find happiness -- or some approximation -- is at a bar?

Makes sense to us. 


Mainly because putting up with Convicted Felon Donald Chump's attacks on our country and our way of life requires that you hit the hard stuff.  A lot.

For some that may be booze, for others it might be sweets.  Everyone's got their own thing and we're all in need of a fix.


It's really the only way to stomach all the lies.  

Such as?  How about JD Vance, Second Lady in Waiting, claiming he was chased over the weekend.  Chased?  Chased involves running.  Have people not seen Vance's ass?  He can't run with that thing.  And he didn't. Nor did have to.  As Vice President, he has a Secret Service detail with him where ever he goes.  But if Miss Sassy couldn't milk the drama with his own two hands, he'd have to use a breast pump.

Even more out of touch are the Republicans in Congress who were given the advice -- and so far have wrongly taken it -- to stop doing townhalls and encounters with their constituents.  

Their constituents are their bosses.  It's not smart to avoid them.  Avoidance makes it clear that you don't respect them, makes it clear that you aren't connected to them and most likely will make it clear to them that they shouldn't vote for you.

Infected with a toxic case of MAGA, the members of Congress believe this to be good advice.




After Roger Marshall, a senator from Kansas, was hounded out of his own town hall event last week, Republican party leaders had had enough. Mike Johnson, the Republican House speaker, and Richard Hudson, the chair of the GOP’s fundraising body, decided the embarrassment had to end, and they told Republicans to stop holding the public events.

But while that might save some Republican politicians from public humiliation, it could also deprive Americans of opportunities to interact with their elected officials, experts said, and prevent people from letting their representatives they are not happy with the increasingly divisive direction of the Trump administration.

“It’s certainly a unique view of representation that representatives should hear only from constituents who agree with them,” said Marjorie Hershey, professor emeritus of political science at Indiana University Bloomington.

“But it’s entirely in keeping with the recent direction of the Republican party: to become more and more extreme because they listen only to their far-right base.”

Johnson and Hudson’s edict came after several Republican town halls were interrupted in recent weeks. Scott Fitzgerald, a four-year congressman, faced an angry crowd at an event in West Bend, Wisconsin, in late February. Fitzgerald was repeatedly booed as he defended the role of Elon Musk, in particular.

Apparently misjudging his audience, Fitzgerald said Musk is “getting rid of the DEI”, to loud jeers, before receiving a similar reaction when he praised “the fraud and abuse that has been discovered” by the department of government efficiency.

A video from TMJ4 showed attendees carrying signs including “Presidents are not kings” and “No cuts to Medicaid”. Glenn Grothman, also from Wisconsin, received similar treatment at a town hall a couple of days later, being loudly booed as he claimed that “across the board [Trump] has done some very good things”, including birthright citizenship and – using the same phrasing as Fitzgerald – “getting rid of the DEI”.


Now maybe we overindulged -- or maybe having not been infected with MAGA, we're not suffering from swamp fever -- but we're having a really difficult time seeing how a member of Congress avoiding their constituents does anything but piss them off.  However, those suffering from the scourge of the West, insist that it won't and believe that avoiding the voters and the issues they raise will pacify the voters and make them forget.

Amnesia is the Donald Chump strategy when it comes to voters.  And he's convinced that, if everyone will stop talking about the high costs of eggs, people will stop noticing the huge increase in the cost of eggs and other groceries.  JD Wolf (MTN) explains:


As Americans continue to grapple with soaring grocery prices, Trump shared an article that downplays concerns over the rising cost of eggs. In a Truth Social post, Trump reposted an opinion piece by right-wing commentator Charlie Kirk, titled "Shut Up About Egg Prices — Trump Is Saving Consumers," which dismisses the outrage over the price hikes.
The article acknowledges that “a dozen currently costs around $7, up from just $2 in October,” but argues that inflation under Trump is not as bad as critics claim. Telling voters to shut up about high prices in the Trump economy may not be a winning strategy. 


Charlie Kirk, noted racist and evil doer, thinks ignoring inflation is "a winning strategy"?  That tracks. Mainly because Charlie Kirk is just stupid enough to believe that.  The brain's been warped by MAGA and he no longer remembers that his first act of activism was in high school when they went up on the price of a cookie and the hissy fit he threw.  If he only had a brain, he'd remember how angry that increased cost made him and grasped that trying to bottle that anger is not going to work -- not for him or his pin up and man crush Donald Chump.


It wouldn't for Charlie in high school and it's not going to work for Chump.  Prices do not just remain high, they've gotten higher and they are continuing to climb.  Not talking about inflation will not erase it from our minds.  Ed Mazza (HUFFINGTON POST) makes an important point:


However, Trump campaigned heavily on not just cutting prices, but doing so on his very first day in office

“I will immediately bring prices down starting on Day 1,” he said on Aug. 15, for example. “Starting the day I take the oath of office, I will rapidly drive prices down,” he promised later that some month. 

He backed away from that last month. 


He promised it.

There's another point that needs to be made there.  

It's true that many politicians break promises.  It's also true that those running for president often make very big promises and then fail to deliver.  But while you might cut slack for a first time nominee, Chump occupied the office of president from January 2017 through January 2021.  Meaning?  He was no starry eyed first timer.  He knew from experience what was possible and what was not.  He also knew what he had to say -- which lie to tell -- in order to garner votes.

He lied knowingly and willingly.  He got back into the White House and he no longer cares about the needs of the people.  

HAPPY'S PLACE finds Reba back on TV and she's a crowd pleaser, yes,  but, more than that, she's also a better actress now and can offer more than personality.  Chump?  He never had personality to coast on to begin with.  And he's got nothing to offer -- nothing that any sane person wants at any rate.




Books (Isaiah, Ava and C.I.)

 1summerread

 

As we did in 2021 and 2023 and 2024, we're attempting to again increase book coverage in the community. This go round, we're talking with  Isaiah about his review of  Chaz Gower's "STAN LEE LIED: YOUR HANDY GUIDE TO EVERY LIE IN THE ORIGINS OF MARVEL COMICS.".  You recommend it?



Isaiah: I do.  I recommend it for a number of reasons.  First, it's a fascinating book.  Gower gets very detailed and involved and you'll love the amount of information he presents.  Second, Stan Lee has stolen credit over and over from others so I recommend it because it sets the historical record straight.

And that's important.


Isaiah: It's very important.  The truth does matter.  That's what so many of us respond to in your writing.  And look at the impact -- "California Dreamin'" was the Mamas and the Papas biggest hits.  But it took you two pointing that out at THIRD for WIKIPEDIA and others to grasp it.


To be clear, for any late to the party, "Monday Monday" was a number one hit for one week.  "California Dreamin'" -- the group's first single -- peaked on different charts around the country at different times and never hit number one on the national weekly chart.  But it is the bigger hit because it made to number one on BILLBOARD's singles chart for 1966 -- the number one selling song of the entire year.  It sold two million more copies than "Monday Monday."  It is the band's biggest hit.  What was Stan Lee's biggest hit?


Isaiah: When MARVEL started reprinting older comics and he got to add his name to them as writer even though Jack Kirby wrote and drew his own comics.  People were credited in the original editions.  But when those 60s editions were reprinted a decade or more later?  Suddenly, they had Stan Lee's name on it.


Why?


Isaiah: Because he was a glory hog who had no glory and because he was related to the owner.  And putting his name -- falsely -- on these books meant he and MARVEL could retain the intellectual rights.  He's just a liar.  And it's interesting how lies get started and who they're used against.  The book reminded me of the stuff you two have written about THE WIZ and how it's been falsely attacked regarding money and regarding Diana Ross.


You can talk about that if you want, we're probably not going to very much because we've actually traced down another lie on that, the original lie that popularized it online.  And we plan to write about that soon.  But we will again note that the film was not a bomb.  And that the film was released beyond North America even if no one wants to ever note the overseas box office. But it is cute how IMDB is the basis for box office for CRAPAPEDIA and CRAPAPEDIA calls CONVOY, released the same year as THE WIZ, a hit and they call F.I.S.T. a hit when THE WIZ is 21 for 1978, right between CONVOY and F.I.S.T.  It's part of the attack on Black history and Black artists to downgrade THE WIZ and to attack Diana Ross.


Isaiah: Without Diana, there is no movie.  It would never have been made.  Can we talk about that?  I know it's not books but as a Black man I've gotten really sick of all the attacks and that was before you guys started writing about how these attacks were based on lies.  


Sure.  Rob Cohen, the producer,  knew that Diana as Dorothy meant two things -- the film got made and Diana would get a million dollars for her portrayal.  Diana was the first box office actress to be Black.  She twice made the list of the 20 box office stars.  And without her, the film wouldn't have been made.  It would have been another successful Broadway show with an all Black cast or even a majority Black cast that got optioned throughout the seventies but never got made.  Diana meant box office.  A film that brought in that amount -- and this is film rentals, not ticket sales -- is not a bomb. 


Isaiah:  It brought in basically four times the box office that Richard Pryor's BLUE COLLAR did the same year. But NETFLIX didn't mention that in the 'documentary' where they slammed Diana and accused her of ending Black movies.  And, to bring it back to the book, Chaz Gower's book does a real service, for the record, for truth, for Jack Kirby and others who've seen their credits watered down or outright stolen. 

------------------------------

Previous book discussions:

"Books (Jess, Ava and C.I.)"


"Books (Stan, Ava and C.I.)"


"Books (Trina, Ava and C.I.)"


"Books (Rebecca, Marcia, Ava and C.I.)"





Book List

books

 Book coverage continues in this community.  For earlier lists of books covered see 2021's  "Books," 2023's "Books" and 2024 "Book List"


Books reviewed in the community this year.


1) "bob hope should be a lesson" -- Rebecca reviews Richard Zoglin.  


2) "Shattered Love: A Memoir" -- Marcia reviews Richard Chamberlain's insipid autobiography. 


3) "Help! My Apartment Has A Dining Room Cookbook: How to Have People Over Without Stressing Out" -- Trina reviews a cookbook.


4)  "Media: OWNED finds Eoin Higgins owned by bad journalism" -- Ava and C.I. take on Eoin Higgins bad book.


5) "Sly's awful books proves Questlove a liar" -- Stan reviews Sly Stone's memoir. 


6) "THE LIFE AND HARD TIMES OF HEIDI ABROMOWITZ (Jess)" -- Jess reviews a humor book by Joan Rivers.


7) "STAN LEE LIED: YOUR HANDY GUIDE TO EVERY LIE IN THE ORIGINS OF MARVEL COMICS" -- Isaiah reviews a book documenting truths. 






You can learn a lot on BLUESKY

We're reposting Marica because (a) we should all be off Twitter and (b) BLUESKY is a platform we recommend.  Marcia's done a grab bag post tonight using just BLUESKY.


BlueSky grab bag

I'm just going to note some BlueSky posts tonight.
























And I'm big STAR TREK fan so I've got to include this.






Here's C.I.'s "The snapshot:"

2025 passings

ceme

 


In 2025, we'll continue to note passings that we see as significant -- as we did previously "2024 passings" and  "2023 passings."



"David Lynch" -- Stan notes the passing of a director.


"Joan Plowright" -- Marcia notes the passing of an actress 


"Movies and Leslie Charleson" -- Stan notes the passing of daytime actress Leslie Charleson. 


"Roberta Flack" and "Roberta Flack was one of a kind amazing" -- Kat and Elaine reflect on the art of Roberta Flack. 

"Gene Hackman" -- Stan covers the passing of a two time Academy Award winner.


"Angie Stone" -- Betty covers the passing of the queen of neo soul.



Last week's Senate moment you should have caught

 









Video of Exchange (YouTube) 

Washington, D.C. – At a hearing of the Senate Finance Committee, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) questioned Dr. Michael Faulkender, President Trump’s nominee for Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, on Republicans’ “magic math” for their plans to cut taxes for the ultra-wealthy. Republican leaders are increasingly supportive of using a “current policy baseline” for their tax package to hide the true cost of their proposed $4.6 trillion tax package.

Congress’ independent scorekeepers have historically scored legislation using a “current law baseline,” which assumes that temporary tax cuts will expire and that extending those tax cuts will cost money. A current policy baseline, on the other hand, assumes that temporary tax cuts will not expire and that extending those tax cuts will cost $0. When pressed by Senator Warren on whether this gimmick actually produces additional revenue, Dr. Faulkender admitted, "I can't imagine that it would.”

Last month, Senator Warren sent a letter to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), which provides Members of Congress with revenue estimates for tax legislation. She pressed for answers on whether JCT has ever used a “current policy baseline” for official scoring purposes on the Senate floor, among other questions, to set the record straight on Republicans’ “magic math."

Ahead of his nomination hearing before the Senate Finance Committee, Senator Warren also sent a 32-page letter to Dr. Faulkender, pressing him to explain his views on his potential Treasury responsibilities.

Transcript: Hearing to examine the nomination of Michael Faulkender, of Maryland, to be Deputy Secretary of the Treasury
Senate Finance Committee
March 6, 2025 

Senator Elizabeth Warren: Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. So, President Trump had exactly one big legislative accomplishment in his first term: a giant tax cut for millionaires, billionaires, and massive corporations. In fact, it was so giant that a big hunk of it lasted only eight years and still cost $2 trillion. Now, the eight years are up, so Republicans want to do another tax cut for the ultra-wealthy, which Congress’ non-partisan budget scorers say is going to cost $4.6 trillion this time. Now, Congressional Republicans say they care about the deficit, so they have a plan to fix things up: repeal math. Here's their story: because they already had eight years of tax cuts that ran up the debt, Congressional Republicans claim that 10 more years of tax cuts will be free. They named this gimmick the ‘current policy baseline.’ They should have named it “magic math.” It is so nuts that when we need to figure out the cost of tax cuts, the Senate has never, never switched to it over using real math. 

Now, Dr. Faulkender, if confirmed, you will play a role in whatever tax deal the Republicans put together. So let's talk about math,“magic math” and real math. Dr. Faulkender, does renaming tax cuts produce any additional revenue?

Michael Faulkender, Deputy Secretary-Designate, U.S. Department of the Treasury: Does renaming them–

Senator Warren: Yes, calling them something different. Does that produce any additional revenue?

Dr. Faulkender: I don't think renaming something changes—if it changes behavior, it has the potential to change revenues.

Senator Warren: Wait, so, are you saying renaming tax cuts produces additional revenue? Just renaming it?

Dr. Faulkender: I can't imagine that it would, unless it causes people to behave differently. 

Senator Warren: Okay, I'll take that as no. Fair enough? Claiming that somehow losing $4.6 trillion in tax revenues is free is just plain nuts. Congressional Republicans are hoping they can fool people long enough to deliver giveaways to their wealthy donors before anyone figures it out. But at the end of the day, Republicans cannot repeal math. A bunch of tax cuts for billionaires will cost $4.6 trillion.

But congressional Republicans don't like that answer. So, I'm wondering, if they love magic math so much, I want to ask the same question in reverse. If the Republicans’ idea of magically not counting the cost of tax cuts for billionaires makes sense, what about not counting the cost of tax cuts for ordinary people? That is, for extending the Child Tax Credit? 

Dr. Faulkender, according to Republicans’ magic math, if extending the tax cuts is free, shouldn't extending a temporary expansion of the Child Tax Credit also be free?

Dr. Faulkender: Thank you, Senator. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act increased the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000, and so if we allow that tax cut to expire, it would mean that the child tax credit would go back to the $1,000. 

Senator Warren: Right. So, the question I'm asking is, using Republican “magic math,” if it is free to extend tax cuts for billionaires, isn't it also free to extend tax cuts for poor kids? 

Dr. Faulkender: Senator, I'm not familiar with magic math, but what I do know is that the American people look at the current tax code, what they paid last year and what they paid this year as the current environment. So, the question is, when we talk about extending it, I would argue that extending the TCJA is making sure that the American people don't incur a $4.5 trillion tax increase.

Senator Warren: So, you do think that renaming the tax cuts will produce $4.5 trillion in revenue? 

Dr. Faulkender: No, Senator, I didn't say that it had any impact on the bottom line deficit. I'm just saying when you ask me what a baseline is, to me, the baseline is what I'm currently doing.

Senator Warren: I’m not asking you that. I'm asking you what it costs to put in $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. Look, if Republican “magic math” works, then why not extend it to everything we spend money on? How about the money we spent last year on roads and bridges or child care subsidies and the workers who process Social Security checks? Of course not. No one is going to do that. 

Congressional Republicans want to use “magic math” to pass giant tax cuts, and then try to tell the American people those tax cuts cost nothing. Hard-working Americans understand that $4.6 trillion for a billionaire tax cut is not free. Congressional Republicans are trying to sell magic math so they can help billionaires, and fortunately, the American people are just not buying that. 

###  

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
 
Poll1 { display:none; }